Changes in Healthcare During the Past 30 Years: Can the National Health Service in the United Kingdom Survive?

At the turn of the century, the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom (UK) was considered one of the top public healthcare systems in the world. Not only was it comprehensive and inclusive, but it was also free at the point of delivery for the entire UK population. It was also largely available to visitors and the families of residents that lived outside the UK. During the past 30 years, the NHS has received more and more funding both in cash terms and as a percentage of the gross national product. Despite this, the general consensus is that the NHS is delivering a poor service. The current government is facing unprecedented strike action from all areas of the workforce including doctors and nurses. This editorial asks the following questions: Where has the money gone? What has caused the current crisis? Can the current NHS model survive in today's highly technological healthcare environment?

Defensive qi (qi defensivum, weiqi): its modern use according to the treatise on cold damage (Shanghan lun) and the doctrine of warm diseases (morbi temperati, wenbing).

Weiqi, defensive qi (qi defensivum, weiqi) is deployed throughout the external surfaces (extima, biao) and flows through the channels. This defensive qi (qi defensivum, weiqi) protects the body from external heteropathies (xie). It also regulates body temperature, sweating, circadian rhythm and sensory perceptions. In the system of six main channels in the Treatise on Cold Damage (Shanghan lun) a disorder of the major yang (yang maior, taiyang) is regarded as an illness of the defensive qi (qi defensivum, weiqi). In the four-levels model of Warm Diseases (morbi temperati, wenbing) a disturbance of this defensive layer (qi defensivum, weiqi) is related to the early stage of fever caused by warm pathogens (calor heteropathies, rexie) as, for example, in the case of influenza, pneumonia, Covid-19, etc. This article cites passages from the Treatise on Cold Damage (Shanghan lun) and from the doctrine of Warm Diseases (morbi temperati, wenbing) for the treatment with Chinese phytotherapy;it also describes the corresponding acupuncture points and moxibustion treatments and how the theory of defensive qi (qi defensivum, weiqi) is to be applied in the treatment of long Covid, sleep disorders, depression and anxiety, sweating and bi-syndrome.Copyright © 2023, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

COVID-19 Risk Management: a Survey among Italian physicians.

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant global impact on public health. The increasing demand for intensive care and the closure of several health facilities has led to a reduction in the assistance of non-COVID patients. In our study, we investigated what changes health professionals have experienced in their professional activities and how they coped with them. A questionnaire was sent to 146 doctors, focused on three subjects: type of activity carried out during the pandemic; use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and recourse to vaccination; current medical liability profiles related to COVID-19. The questionnaire was completed by 111 doctors. The study showed no significant differences in the questionnaire response as regards the demographic and work variables of the participants (gender, age, area of specialties). Most of doctors assisted potentially positive patients, which also imposed derogations on their safety. Most of the complaints were about the low adequacy of PPE provision and about the compromission of specialist medical care. The interest in safety among participants was revealed by the high compliance to vaccination, with almost complete coverage. The questionnaires showed that most doctors (72,7%) believe that specialist medical care has been impaired during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondly, a high percentage of participants (79.8%) expressed the need for both civil and criminal limitation of liability in connection with work in the management of SARS-Cov-2 patients. In conclusion, this survey tried to contribute to the identification of the main problems presented by healthcare professionals. Their versatility was a crucial element for the management of the pandemic, but also highlighted the need for health institutions to prepare pandemic plans in the future, with adequate and constant updating. Concerns were raised regarding financial deficits and legal protection. Political decisions must be entrusted to enhance medical assistance and to avoid the increasing phenomenon of defensive medicine.

"Second victims" in Covid-19 pandemic: A crosssectional study among medical doctors of the Catanzaro Hospital

Introduction: Medical errors are a serious public health problem. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused further stress to doctors with the increase in patient mortality, the lack of definite guideline and growing work demands. In this scenario, the patient is not the only victim of the medical error. The "second victim" (SV) is defined as a health worker who was involved in an unforeseen and negative event for the patient, who suffers physically and psychologically, because he was traumatized by his own mistake and/or by the injuries caused to the patient. The SV phenomenon prevalence varies from 10.4% up to 43.3%. Objective(s): The aim of this study is to evaluate the second victim phenomenon during the COVID-19 pandemic among medical doctors of the Catanzaro University Hospital (Italy). Method(s): A cross-sectional study will be conducted by administering an anonymous questionnaire to the Catanzaro University Hospital medical doctors using SurveyMonkey software. Descriptive analysis will be performed. Result(s): The data collection is ongoing. Currently, 300 subjects are included in the sample. Conclusion(s): The second victim phenomenon has a negative impact on doctors, colleagues and patients. It is important to aid health workers involved in an adverse event by activating support networks and adopting appropriate strategies in order that the event is a source of learning and not of demotivation.

DEFENSIVE MEDICINE FIFTY YEARS LATER: BACK TO THE BEGINNING?

This article aims to provide a reflection on the defensive medicine (DM) fifty years after this concept was first explored in 1972. This phenomenon combines the deviation from good medical practice and the avoidance of claims against physicians. In this climate of litigation and medical errors with consequences for professionals, both human and professional, the term "second victim" was also coined, resulting in the compromising of patient safety. In depth analysis is done, aiming to gather different measures, causes, effects, excuses, and response to this global problem. After the covid-19 pandemic, scientific societies and authors offer a fresh view identifying DM as a cause of overuse of resources and updating the critical vision of the early authors from the seventies. Evidence seems to indicate that we are witnessing a return to the beginning. © 2022, William S. Hein & Co., Inc.. All rights reserved.

Death Related to a Congenital Vascular Anomaly of Pulmonary Hamartoma Type: Malpractice or Tragic Fatality?

In forensic pathology, apparently straightforward cases can often hide rarities that, if not correctly interpreted, can alter the results of the entire investigation, leading to misinterpretations. This occurs when the investigation is conducted to assess medical malpractice. An unexpected death, with no known apparent cause, is often linked to an underlying disease process of unclear etiological origin whose nature can, unfortunately, be properly investigated only post-mortem. This presentation shows a case study, in which it was possible to reconduct the death of a patient to a natural pathology and not to medical treatment. Here, the authors illustrate a case with a hamartoma developed in chronic inflammatory conditions (bronchiectasis) that was difficult to differentiate from lung cancer due to the inability to perform specific instrumental examinations. The hamartoma, usually benign and identifiable by standard instrumental investigations, in this case, led to the patient's death precisely during the execution of a bronchoscopy. However, in the absence of a certain cause of death, public opinion unanimously attributes a patient's disease to medical error. Indeed, a routine practice such as bronchoscopy should not cause death and consequently, the doctor must have made a mistake. Fortunately, the autopsy not only demonstrated the origin of the bleeding but also unveiled the reason for this, as rare congenital lung disease. Fate, one might say.

The fine line of defensive medicine.

Defensive medicine is a practice that has been utilized by clinicians in efforts of preventing patient dissatisfaction and malpractice claims and may be done through either omission or commission. As much as 57% of physicians have disclosed that they practice defensive medicine. However, this practice does not necessarily prevent malpractice claims and more importantly, neither does it equate to good medical practice, with some leading to poor outcomes. Unfortunately, there is a high percentage of malpractice claims lodged against clinicians in both primary care and hospital settings. Specialists such as surgeons, obstetricians, and gynecologists face the highest claims. In particular, during the SARS CoV-2 pandemic, with new challenges and limited treatment algorithms, there is an even greater concern for possible bourgeoning claims. Counteracting defensive medicine can be accomplished through decriminalizing malpractice claims, leaving physician oversight up to state medical boards and hospital claims management committees. Additional tort reform measures must also be taken such as caps on noneconomic damages to ensure emphasis on beneficence and nonmaleficence. Once these are in place, it may well serve to increase clinician-patient trust and improve patient independence in the shared decision-making process of their treatment, allowing clinicians to practice their full scope of practice without feeling wary of potential malpractice claims.